Inspire Blog Category: Course Design/Learning Design

Discussion Boards: Should They Stay, Go, or Revamp in the AI Era?

“Discussions are boring”, “it is so hard for students to truly engage,” “the linearity of the discussions doesn’t help to navigate and find the threads”, “posts could be AI-generated.” If you’ve voiced one of these about discussion boards, you’re not alone. Oftentimes, I hear instructors express these concerns. Discussion boards were once considered spaces for bringing students together to engage in authentic and genuine conversations. However, in today’s AI world, the concerns are compounded by the risk that discussion posts could be generated by AI, lacking students’ own voices and personal investment in building community. What is not working with discussion boards? Discussion boards have been the default tool in online courses to create a space for students and their instructors … Discussion Boards: Should They Stay, Go, or Revamp in the AI Era?

The Group Project Paradox: Everyone Thinks They Did the Most Work

The Skill Students Resist, and Employers Expect I have a confession. When I was earning my M.S.Ed. online, I dreaded seeing “group project” on a syllabus. I juggled coursework with a full-time job, logged in at odd hours, and did most of the work on every collaborative assignment. My standards were higher, my contributions more substantial, my late nights longer. I carried the team. Here’s the awkward part: so did everyone else. Researchers have been studying this phenomenon since 1979, when psychologists Michael Ross and Fiore Sicoly found that group members consistently overestimate their own contributions (Ross & Sicoly, 1979). When you ask everyone on a team to estimate their percentage of the work, the numbers don’t add up to … The Group Project Paradox: Everyone Thinks They Did the Most Work

Link Accessibility – FAQs

The golden rule of link accessibility: links should be descriptive! For foundational information on the why and the how, see OSU Digital Accessibility – Links.)  Let’s dig deeper into a few common questions: Can I use “click here” or “this” for my link text? This practice is not ideal, and it’s best to avoid it. While WCAG does permit it when surrounding context provides enough information, you would not be creating a good experience for your audience. That type of text is not descriptive enough to show the user where the link will go, and it’s especially problematic if this text appears multiple times! Think of people skimming the content – whether visually or via assistive technologies. It’s much more … Link Accessibility – FAQs

Refining Rubrics & Assessments: AI as Design Support – Part 2

This blog post is a continuation from “Refining Rubrics & Assessments: AI as Design Support – Part 1“. Using AI to Refine Rubric Language In the previous post, I gave an assignment prompt to Copilot (as that’s the recommended tool at Oregon State University) and asked it to complete the task. For reference, here is the task. Rubrics are often the weakest link in assessment design, particularly when descriptors rely on vague phrases like “meets expectations” or “demonstrates understanding.” One way to evaluate rubric clarity is to ask AI to self-assess its own response using the rubric criteria. If the model can plausibly justify a high score despite shallow reasoning or inconsistent logic, the rubric may not be clearly distinguishing … Refining Rubrics & Assessments: AI as Design Support – Part 2

Refining Rubrics & Assessments: AI as Design Support – Part 1

For centuries, knowledge and access to education was restricted to just a few. In today’s’ world, almost anybody can access information through the web and more recently through AI tools. However, it is important to recognize that these tools, while offering expansive access to content of varied nature, also pose challenges. Generative AI has fundamentally changed how students interact with assignments, but it has also given instructors a powerful new lens for examining their own assessment design. Rather than treating AI solely as a threat to academic integrity, we can use it as a diagnostic tool – one that quickly reveals whether our assignments and rubrics are actually measuring what we think they are. If an AI can complete an … Refining Rubrics & Assessments: AI as Design Support – Part 1