Two Sides to Every Rubric
Research on rubrics has often focused on validity and reliability (Matshedisho, 2020), but more recent work explores how students actually interpret and use rubrics (Brookhart, 2015; Matshedisho, 2020; Taylor, 2024; Tessier, 2021). This emerging scholarship consistently shows a gap between instructor intention and student interpretation. For example, Matshedisho (2020) found that “students expected procedural and declarative guidance, while instructors expected conceptual, reflective work” (p. 175). If students understand rubrics differently than we intend, rubrics cannot fully support learning. Below are key reasons this mismatch occurs—and strategies to close the gap. Tacit Knowledge and Language Students bring varied backgrounds, disciplinary exposure, and assumptions to their learning (Brookhart, 2015; Matshedisho, 2020). Many do not enter college knowing what a rubric is or … Two Sides to Every Rubric
