Inspire Blog Tag: course design

The Group Project Paradox: Everyone Thinks They Did the Most Work

The Skill Students Resist, and Employers Expect I have a confession. When I was earning my M.S.Ed. online, I dreaded seeing “group project” on a syllabus. I juggled coursework with a full-time job, logged in at odd hours, and did most of the work on every collaborative assignment. My standards were higher, my contributions more substantial, my late nights longer. I carried the team. Here’s the awkward part: so did everyone else. Researchers have been studying this phenomenon since 1979, when psychologists Michael Ross and Fiore Sicoly found that group members consistently overestimate their own contributions (Ross & Sicoly, 1979). When you ask everyone on a team to estimate their percentage of the work, the numbers don’t add up to … The Group Project Paradox: Everyone Thinks They Did the Most Work
by · April 15, 2026

Link Accessibility – FAQs

The golden rule of link accessibility: links should be descriptive! For foundational information on the why and the how, see OSU Digital Accessibility – Links.)  Let’s dig deeper into a few common questions: Can I use “click here” or “this” for my link text? This practice is not ideal, and it’s best to avoid it. While WCAG does permit it when surrounding context provides enough information, you would not be creating a good experience for your audience. That type of text is not descriptive enough to show the user where the link will go, and it’s especially problematic if this text appears multiple times! Think of people skimming the content – whether visually or via assistive technologies. It’s much more … Link Accessibility – FAQs
by · March 30, 2026

Two Sides to Every Rubric

Research on rubrics has often focused on validity and reliability (Matshedisho, 2020), but more recent work explores how students actually interpret and use rubrics (Brookhart, 2015; Matshedisho, 2020; Taylor, 2024; Tessier, 2021). This emerging scholarship consistently shows a gap between instructor intention and student interpretation. For example, Matshedisho (2020) found that “students expected procedural and declarative guidance, while instructors expected conceptual, reflective work” (p. 175). If students understand rubrics differently than we intend, rubrics cannot fully support learning. Below are key reasons this mismatch occurs—and strategies to close the gap. Tacit Knowledge and Language Students bring varied backgrounds, disciplinary exposure, and assumptions to their learning (Brookhart, 2015; Matshedisho, 2020). Many do not enter college knowing what a rubric is or … Two Sides to Every Rubric
by · March 3, 2026

Customizing Your Canvas Course

Customizing your Canvas course is a simple way to create a smoother, more intuitive learning experience—for both you and your students. With a few strategic adjustments, you can create a polished, efficient Canvas set-up that gives students a clean, streamlined learning environment. Personalize Your Home Page Instructors can choose which page students see first when clicking into their Canvas course, and a well-designed homepage can act as a dashboard for the entire course. Most Ecampus courses have a home page that includes a custom banner with the course code and name as well as links to the modules, Start Here module, and Syllabus page. You might want to add links to external tools or websites your students will use frequently … Customizing Your Canvas Course
by · December 8, 2025

Students Don’t Want AI Bans—They Want a Seat at the Table

Many educators are grappling with questions about AI detection. Yet, AI detection tools are unreliable, biased, and distressing. False positives can harm students’ academic standing and well-being, with marginalized groups often disproportionately affected, while detectors still miss significant portions of AI-generated text (Lurye, 2025; Encouraging Academic Integrity, 2025; Hirsch, 2024). And detection tools assume students simply copy and paste AI outputs, when in reality many use these tools more fluidly–taking suggestions, rewriting, or iterating through prompts–making their work indistinguishable from original writing. As one student noted, “it’s very easy to use AI to do the lion’s share of the thinking while still submitting work that looks like your own…” (Terry, 2023). What Students Want Most students believe institutions should address … Students Don’t Want AI Bans—They Want a Seat at the Table
by · November 25, 2025